As a trial lawyer with experience beyond his years, Jim addresses his clients’ most difficult legal challenges. Even corporate clients with large, sophisticated legal departments that employ multiple law firms trust Jim with their bet-the-business problems.


Jim's considerable knowledge of complex construction litigation ensures that his clients get effective representation. He is also top choice for disputes over insurance, lender liability, intra-company management and real estate purchases. Because of his unique ability to analyze complex legal issues, Jim has repeatedly been enlisted to reshape strategies mid-case when the client was at heightened risk of losing. His fresh ideas and sophisticated analysis changes the course of the litigation, creating victories for cases that were destined for defeat.

Jim leverages his background as an insurance adjuster for a national insurance company to aid his clients and has represented local municipalities, contractors, developers, purchasers, insurers, investors, businesses, and property owners in complex litigation, including construction defects, contract disputes, wrongful termination and claims for equitable adjustment of construction contracts. He has also been indispensable in cases involving the emerging medicinal cannabis industry, litigating complex cases in both arbitration and court.


Championing a corporate client, Jim recovered more than $10 million in litigation after the company's former executive diverted company money to purchase multimillion dollar insurance policies prior to his death.

Breaking new legal ground, he litigated a case that clarified legal doctrines for discharging liens, options, and other encumbrances. The published appellate opinion is Brimet II LLC v. Destiny Homes Marketing.

Employing a first-of-its-kind analysis, Jim was able to place a construction issue on a referendum ballot despite admitted defects in the petition. The published appellate decision is Forszt v. Stop Oro Valley Outrageous Giveways.

Successfully litigated for an expansive scope of arbitrators’ powers to resolve commercial construction disputes. The published appellate decision is Sun Valley Ranch 308 v. Robson.

Sued a structural engineer for a design defect affecting multiple homes in a development, obtaining a judgment for the entire claim, including an award of all attorneys' fees and costs and additional monetary sanctions against the design engineer.

Testified to Arizona Legislative Committee regarding the Purchaser Dwelling Action statute, November 14, 2018.

News & Insights

Speaking Engagements

"A New Frontier: Enforcing Waivers of the Implied Warranty of Good Workmanship and Habitability" CLE, September 12, 2019

"Update on Emerging Trends in Homeowner Defect Claims" CLE, November 13, 2018

Professional & Civic Activities

Professional & Civic Activities

Home Builders Association of Central Arizona

Boy Scouts of America

Goodwill of Central Arizona, Inc., May 2007-Dec 2013

  • Board of Directors – Secretary
  • Executive Committee

Arizona Bar Association

Maricopa County Bar Association


  • Arizona, 2002


Arizona State University, J.D., magna cum laude, 2002

  • Order of the Coif 
  • Willard H. Pedrick Scholar

Arizona State University, B.S., summa cum laude, 1998

Jump to Page

We use cookies on our website to improve functionality and performance, analyze website traffic and enable social media features. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our use of cookies. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.