Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services Announces 60-Day Overpayment Rule
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) published the Reporting and Returning of Overpayments Final Rule (Final Rule) on February 12, 2016. The Final Rule implements Section 6402(a) of the Affordable Care Act, which requires a person enrolled in the Medicare program as a provider or supplier (e.g., a hospital or a physician) who has received an overpayment through Medicare Part A or Part B to report and return the overpayment using one of the processes described below. The overpayment must be reported and returned by the later of (1) 60 days after the date on which the overpayment was identified, or (2) the date any corresponding cost report is due. If an overpayment is not returned within the required time, the provider or supplier may become liable for the amount of the overpayment and any applicable civil penalties and damages under the False Claims Act. The Final Rule became effective March 14, 2016.
While the Final Rule clarifies and relaxes key aspects of the regulations initially proposed by CMS, it also imposes certain affirmative obligations on providers and suppliers:
- Applies Only to Medicare Parts A and B
The Final Rule applies only to payments made to providers and suppliers under the Medicare Part A and Part B programs. Medicare Part C and Part D overpayments are addressed separately in a final rule published May 23, 2014. No final rule has been published that addresses the reporting and return of Medicaid overpayments.
- Six-Year Look-Back Period
CMS shortened the look-back period in the Final Rule from 10 years to six years. This means that providers and suppliers are required to report and return within 60 days only those overpayments identified within six years of the date an overpayment was received.
- Identification of Overpayments
The Final Rule specifies that overpayments are not identified until they have been quantified. Specifically, a person is considered to have identified an overpayment when the "person has, or should have, through the exercise of reasonable diligence, determined that the person has received an overpayment and quantified the amount of the overpayment."
- Reasonable Diligence Required
The Final Rule requires that providers and suppliers exercise reasonable diligence in the investigation and quantification of overpayments. The Final Rule defines reasonable diligence as the timely, good faith investigation of credible information within six months of the receipt of the credible information, except in extraordinary circumstances. CMS further states that it is "certainly advisable for providers and suppliers to maintain records that accurately document their reasonable diligence efforts" to demonstrate
- Proactive Compliance
CMS also clarifies in the Final Rule that, in addition to investigations conducted in response to credible information, "reasonable diligence" also requires "proactive compliance activities conducted in good faith by qualified individuals to monitor for the receipt of overpayments."
- Methods of Reporting and Returning Overpayments
In contrast to CMS's initial proposal, which required providers and suppliers to use the "voluntary refund process" to disclose identified overpayments, the Final Rule allows providers and suppliers to report and return overpayments through several different processes, depending on the type of provider or supplier involved and the reason for the overpayment. Available processes through which overpayments may be reported and returned include: the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General Self-Disclosure Protocol (SDP), the CMS Voluntary Self- Referral Disclosure Process (SRDP), the claims adjustment process, the credit balance process, the self-reported refund process, or "another appropriate process."
CMS narrowed the application of the Final Rule in many ways. It only applies to payments made under the Medicare Part A and Part B programs. The look-back period was shortened from 10 years to six years. Overpayments are not considered identified until they have been quantified. CMS also expanded the available means for providers and suppliers to report and return overpayments, making it easier for providers and suppliers to do so. The Final Rule also clarified CMS's expectations regarding investigation and monitoring of overpayments by obligating providers and suppliers to exercise reasonable diligence by investigating credible information regarding overpayments in a timely, good faith manner and engaging in proactive compliance activities.
Sara Noel is a member of the firm's Health Law practice group. Her practice focuses on provider, health plan and insurance law with an emphasis on transactional, contracting (including managed care and Medicare contracting) and regulatory issues. Sara works from the firm's Minneapolis office. For more information please contact Ms. Noel or your usual Stinson Leonard Street contact.
Laura Nelson is a member of the firm's Health Law practice group. He practice focuses on provider, health plan and insurance law with an emphasis on transactional, contracting, and regulatory issues. Laura works from the firm's Minneapolis office. For more information please contact Ms. Nelson or your usual Stinson Leonard Street contact.
Return to the "Emerging Trends" table of contents.